ArtCult : News of the art market .
Find in the whole site :
  Home
  News
  Features
  Experts tools
  Communication
  Une question ?
Filtres
Année

Catégorie


Recherche
Find in page Archives des News :
Find in the whole site :

Actuellement
Latest Ads
27/06: A MAN NOT TO BE TRUSTED
A man by the name of Oscar Oleg (alproofing75@gmail.com ) has been asking artcult ...
07/03: LOOKING FOR MISSING PIECES
URGENTLY LOOKING FOR THE FOLLOWING MISSING PIECES SINCE FEBRUARY 3, 20161) Fauv...
05/01: MR ROBINSON'S DEC 6, 2014 FORGOTTEN RAMPAGE
On December 6, 2014 Mr David Robinson of Pacific Grove (CA) visited the Au Temps Jadis ...
> Post an ad
Online estimate
Send us a photography and a description and questions, and we will return our point of view.
Sumit estimate

Newsletter
Type in your email to subscribe to our newsletter

Archives des News

Année :
109 entries
VAN GOGH 'S SUNFLOWERS MAY BE GENUINE AFTER ALL
01 April 1998


The controversy regarding the Van Gogh Sunflowers painting bought by the Yasuda Japanese insurance company a few years ago is about to be ended with the discovery of its provenance.

The authenticiity of the 14 sunflowers painting had been disputed by several researchers in France, Britain and Italy but as Artcult suggested last year (see our previous articles) they based their opinions on one of its owners, Emile Schuffenecker, a French artist whom they suspected of being a forger.

In fact, the painting was said to have belonged to Jo Bonger, Van Gogh's sister-in-law who sold it through the widow of Père Tanguy, who was used to supply colour tubes to the artist and to Schuffenecker. Several letters in the archives of the Van Gogh Museum in Amsterdam tend to prove that the sale effectively took place. Tanguy's widow wrote to the brother of Jo Bonger a letter mentioning a price of 600 francs for Van Gogh's Sunflowers and Schuffenecker answered with a counter- offer of 300 francs

The sale was confirmed in a another letter while Jo Bonger received in 1901 a letter showing that Schuffenecker was among the three collectors who loaned the Sunflowers for an exhibition organised by the Bernheim-jeune gallery in Paris. After that event the painting suffered some minor deteriorations and Schuffenecker restored it himself. Thus, contrary to what British journalist Geraldine Norman suggested in a television film released in October 1997 he seemed not to have produced a forgery.

Bogomila Welsh-Ovcharov, a researcher at the University of Toronto, who rediscovered the series of letters also found that Paul Gauguin had also owned another version of the Sunflowers which is now in the collection of the Philadelphia Museum of Art. This painting was sold in 1896 to Count Antoine de la Rochefoucauld by the Paris art dealer Antoine Vollard.

Gauguin said in one letter that he had received this painting from Van Gogh just after it had been painted in 1889.

Regarding the Van Gogh work bought by Yasuda the controversy has however not ended yet as those who dispute its authenticity want more tangible proof. A symposium on Van Gogh due to be held in London on May 15th 1998 will represent an opportunity to clarify certain points. Still, there are now less reasons to believe that this painting is a fake and those who have staged a campaign to say so might soon find themselves without good arguments.

Page précédente 53/109
Retour Retour
Mentions légales Conditions d'utilisation Rédaction Annonceurs Plan du site
Login : Password ArtCult - Made by Adrian Darmon